This article describes the issues involved in dog bite litigation including whether the law considers specific breeds of dogs (such as pit bulls and rottweillers) inherently dangerous. This article describes the issues involved in dog bite litigation including whether the law considers specific breeds of dogs (such as pit bulls and rottweillers) inherently dangerous.

Practice Areas


Blog

Personal Injury

view all

Premises Liability: The Slip and Fall

view all

Workers' Compensation

view all

Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

view all

General

view all

Legal News

Death Benefits Not Mandatory for PA Car Insurance

Bradford County: Judge Beirne presiding

Armenia bans ATVs

Pennsylvania Senate confirms Beirne as Bradford County judge

Local unemployment is on the rise

Attempts to unionize Proctor and Gamble's Mahoopany Plant

Armenia mulls banning ATVs on roads

Bradford County Court in the News

Athens lawyer attends conference

I write letters...

View All

Legal Library

Personal Injury

More Info

Premises Liability: The Slip and Fall

More Info

Workers' Compensation

More Info

Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

More Info

Newsletters

More Info

General

More Info

If You Have Been Bitten or Attacked by a Dog, Then You Need to Read This Article

In my last article, "How to Make a Claim for Injuries Due to a Dog Bite," we discussed some basic laws and other practical issues such as how homeowner's or renter's insurance protects dog owners in these types of situations and provides compensation to those persons who are hurt by dogs.

Now, I would like to provide you some more specific information about the current state of the law surrounding dog bites and things you need to know if you intend to pursue a claim for injuries sustained in a dog bite or attack.

As discussed in the last article, in order to successfully recover compensation (or money) for injuries due to a dog bite, you must show that the dog owner or custodian's behavior was negligent or unreasonable.

Many people often ask me whether certain breeds of dogs, like rottweillers or pit bulls, are automatically considered dangerous by the law and if such dogs bite or attack are their owners or custodians automatically negligent.

Surprisingly, the answer is no, even though many animal experts feel that certain breeds of dogs are more dangerous or more vicious than others.

According to a study recently completed by Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks as a whole and 68% of the attacks upon children.

In his study, Mr. Clifton states, "Pit Bulls and Rottweilers are dogs who not only must be handled with special precautions, but also must be regulated with special requirements appropriate to the risk they may pose to the public and other animals, if they are to be kept at all."

Despite the opinions of these experts, almost all local ordinances have specifically stated that a dog is not vicious or dangerous just because it is a certain breed.

As an example, the Fairfax County Code, states "no dog shall be found to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog solely because it is a particular breed, nor is a particular breed of dog prohibited."

Also, the Prince William County Code has no per se rule, which labels a certain breed of dog to be dangerous.

Another frequently asked question is whether the law will consider the dog owner to be at fault for his dog's behavior if the dog is running off the dog's property without any sort of restraint.

The answer to that question is yes.

Most local ordinances require dogs to be leashed when off their property and/or to be maintained on their property by either a fence or some other obstruction.

Generally, the wording of these local ordinances is that "no dog shall run unrestricted." The word "unrestricted" has been defined as meaning not under the control of the owner or his custodian either by leash, cord, chain, electronic device or primary enclosure when off the property of premises of the owner or custodian.

If an owner allows his dog to run unrestricted, then the owner or custodian is negligent as a matter of law whether or not the owner had knowledge that the dog had previously bitten someone or exhibited prior dangerous behavior.

The law controlling dog bite/attack claims is very complex and I urge you to keep your eyes open for the next installation in this series, which will hopefully continue to educate about the law and how it may apply to you or someone you love who has been bitten or otherwise injured by a dog.



James Parrish is a former insurance defense lawyer who now represents injured persons against the insurance industry. He uses the "Inside Information" he learned while defending insurance companies to the advantage of his clients and has recovered millions of dollars in judgments and settlements for them. http://theparrishlawfirm.com http://accidents.theparrishlawfirm.com