

Athens lawyer attends conference
Inmate from Bradford County jail dies at hospital
Pain lasts long after traumatic injury: U.S. study
Beef Recalled From Cargill's Wylusing, PA Plant
New Case From Pa. Superior Court re. No Felonly Conviction Recovery Rule
W. Mark Lanier, the Houston plaintiffs lawyer who won a $234.4 million jury verdict in Angleton in the nation's first Vioxx trial, isn't mincing words: Thursday's Texas appeals court opinion reversing a judgment in that suit is "judicial activism for corporate America."
Lanier says the 10-page 14th Court of Appeals opinion, written by Chief Justice Adele Hedges, is "cursory" and "seems to construe the evidence in favor of the defendant and leaves out all of the evidence that supports the verdict."
"I'm upset, and I'll appeal it," Lanier says.
In the opinion, the three-justice panel reversed the $26.1 million judgment in Carol Ernst v. Merck & Co. Inc. and rendered judgment that Carol Ernst, whose 59-year-old husband died in 2001 after taking Vioxx for about nine months, should take nothing. The judgment is smaller than the verdict because of statutory caps on punitive damages.
The panel found the evidence to be legally insufficient on the issue of causation.
See the entire article here at Law.com.Post a Comment to "Plaintiffs Lawyer Lanier to Appeal Vioxx Reversal"
To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."
