

Death Benefits Not Mandatory for PA Car Insurance
Armenia mulls banning ATVs on roads
CNN: What To Do After A Car Accident
Fla. Jury Awards $6 Million to Man Injured in Ford Rollover
ERISA Bars Medical Expense Lien Against Child's Trust
Evidence of seatbelt non-use permitted in products liability case involving airbags
Man severely injured in car accident awarded $7.6 million by Delco jury
In State Auto Property & Casualty insurance Co. v. Pro Design, P.C. today the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Munley, J.) held that a corporation can avail itself of stacked underinsured motorist benefits even if it waived stacking on a single vehicle policy where it subsequently added two vehicles to the policy and never signed a new waiver of stacking for those additional vehicles.
The court finds that Sackett II does not apply to a single car policy which is what the Supreme Court says in footnote 5 of Sackett II. The Court also notes that under Sackett II "the degree that coverage under an after-acquired vehicle provision continues in effect throughout the existing period. Once that policy period comes to an end, the insurer must obtain a new waiver if an additional vehicle was added during that period." The fact is that when the single vehicle policy became a multiple vehicle policy the insured was not supposed to be given a chance to "purchase" intra-policy stacking and it did not get a chance to do so. Thus, the 3 car policy provides stacking.
Post a Comment to "New Case Law on stacking of underinsurance by employees in company owned vehicles"
To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."
