Jim and Carrie Carroll at Carroll and Carroll, P.C. represent the injured people of Pennsylvania and New York in Bradford, Sullivan, Tioga, Susquehanna, and Chemung counties in personal injury, premises liability, slip and fall, automobile accident and workers’ compensation cases Jim and Carrie Carroll at Carroll and Carroll, P.C. represent the injured people of Pennsylvania and New York in Bradford, Sullivan, Tioga, Susquehanna, and Chemung counties in personal injury, premises liability, slip and fall, automobile accident and workers’ compensation cases

Practice Areas


Blog

Personal Injury

view all

Premises Liability: The Slip and Fall

view all

Workers' Compensation

view all

Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

view all

General

view all

Legal News

Judge campaign candidates speak at dinner in Towanda

Judge Beirne unopposed in local race

Attorney General Tom Corbett to visit Bradford County

Beirne will run for full term as judge

Bias in Peer Review

Bradford County Employers Laying Off Workers

Death Benefits Not Mandatory for PA Car Insurance

Bradford County: Judge Beirne presiding

Armenia bans ATVs

Pennsylvania Senate confirms Beirne as Bradford County judge

View All

Legal Library

Personal Injury

More Info

Premises Liability: The Slip and Fall

More Info

Workers' Compensation

More Info

Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

More Info

Newsletters

More Info

General

More Info

Blog Category:

Personal Injury

    12/4/2008
    James R. Carroll, Jr., Esquire
    Comments (0)

    Third Restatement of Torts Tops High Court's Agenda

    When the Pennsylvania Supreme Court convenes this week in Harrisburg, a major products liability case will be on its agenda.  Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc. could pull the state into the mainstream on product liability law or further entrench the Commonwealth in its own rules. PaAJ participated as Amicus on this case. Read more  from the Legal Intelligencer.  Read the Superior Court opinion.

    This potentially landmark case could reshape products liability law by adopting the anti-consumer Restatement of Torts (3rd).  Former PaAJ President Cliff Rieders argued in favor of keeping Pennsylvania law consistent with the second restatement.


    According to Rieders, the court showed great interest in his argument that the results in cases involving suppliers or distributors would be the same under either the restatement second or the restatement third.  The court did, however, engage in a lengthy “prospective” discussion about the application of the restatement third and its viability in future cases.  Rieders said that the court was extremely thoughtful and receptive to the historical importance of the restatement second, 402A.

General

    9/17/2008
    James R. Carroll, Jr., Esquire
    Comments (0)

    The question of merit selection of appellate Judges in Pennsylvania

    In a hearing yesterday before the Senate Judiciary Committee in Harrisburg, PaAJ President Mike Foley spoke against legislation calling for merit selection of judges in Pennsylvania. Saying that he was presenting the historical position of the Association on the political appointment of judges along with his personal views, Foley testified that such a system would undermine the populist surge going on currently with the increased number of registered voters. Foley said: “I respectfully suggest that there is a new wave of populism rising in America, and taking away Pennsylvania voters’ right to select their appellate judges runs contrary to the tide.”

    Meanwhile, an article in today’s Legal Intelligencer reports that the proponents of two merit selection bills say they plan to reintroduce the legislation in the new session. 
    Read more  (Subscription required)
    Labels: judge, PaAJ