Jim and Carrie Carroll at Carroll and Carroll, P.C. represent the injured people of Pennsylvania and New York in Bradford, Sullivan, Tioga, Susquehanna, and Chemung counties in personal injury, premises liability, slip and fall, automobile accident and workers’ compensation cases Jim and Carrie Carroll at Carroll and Carroll, P.C. represent the injured people of Pennsylvania and New York in Bradford, Sullivan, Tioga, Susquehanna, and Chemung counties in personal injury, premises liability, slip and fall, automobile accident and workers’ compensation cases

Practice Areas


Blog

Personal Injury

view all

Premises Liability: The Slip and Fall

view all

Workers' Compensation

view all

Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

view all

General

view all

Legal News

Judge campaign candidates speak at dinner in Towanda

Judge Beirne unopposed in local race

Attorney General Tom Corbett to visit Bradford County

Beirne will run for full term as judge

Bias in Peer Review

Bradford County Employers Laying Off Workers

Death Benefits Not Mandatory for PA Car Insurance

Bradford County: Judge Beirne presiding

Armenia bans ATVs

Pennsylvania Senate confirms Beirne as Bradford County judge

View All

Legal Library

Personal Injury

More Info

Premises Liability: The Slip and Fall

More Info

Workers' Compensation

More Info

Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

More Info

Newsletters

More Info

General

More Info

Blog Category:

Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

    4/2/2009
    James R. Carroll, Jr., Esquire
    Comments (0)

    People injured in Springfield Township, Bradford County automobile crash

    I don't normally post about specific automobile accidents and crashes.  However, every once in a while the facts of a specific crash makes think about making a point.

    In a recent crash that happened in Springfield Township, Bradford County, two vehicles collided on Springfield Road (State Route 4014).  You can read the entire article from the Towanda Daily Review
    here.

    It is not clear from the article as to who caused the accident; however, it is clear that it was a significant accident.  Just see the picture of one of the vehicles on its roof.  The article indicates that both drivers were seriously injured and taken to the hospital.  What struck me, though, is that Miss Brown had a four (4) year old in the car who was not injured.

    I am sure the reason this child had no injuries, even though everyone else involved in the accident had serious injuries, was because of the child safety seat.  The reason that I am blogging about this accident is because you can thank trial lawyers and consumer advocates for the child safety seat laws.  Miss Brown’s child was not injured because of what we do every day.

11/11/2008
James R. Carroll, Jr., Esquire
Comments (0)

SUV's Not Safer for Kids

Researchers writing in the current issue of  Pediatrics--(click for link to this research) say they have found little difference in injuries looking at crashes involving passenger cars and S.U.V.'s. The lead author of the study was Dr. Lauren Daly of the Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Wilmington, Del.

Many parents believe that S.U.V.'s are safer and buy them to protect their children.

This belief, however, was not the case when the researchers looked at data from crashes in which almost 4,000 children were traveling in either S.U.V.'s or cars.

 

Rollovers occurred twice as often in S.U.V.'s, the study found, and children were three times as likely to be injured in rollovers than in other kinds of accidents. Use of proper restraining devices is important in all cars and especially important in S.U.V.'s because of the greater incidence of rollovers.

The study does suggest that pediatricians should advise S.U.V.-owning parents to make sure their children are properly restrained.

With S.U.V.'s, the new study reports, whatever benefits come with the added weight are erased by the higher risk of rolling over.