Jim and Carrie Carroll at Carroll and Carroll, P.C. represent the injured people of Pennsylvania and New York in Bradford, Sullivan, Tioga, Susquehanna, and Chemung counties in personal injury, premises liability, slip and fall, automobile accident and workers’ compensation cases Jim and Carrie Carroll at Carroll and Carroll, P.C. represent the injured people of Pennsylvania and New York in Bradford, Sullivan, Tioga, Susquehanna, and Chemung counties in personal injury, premises liability, slip and fall, automobile accident and workers’ compensation cases

Practice Areas


Blog

Personal Injury

view all

Premises Liability: The Slip and Fall

view all

Workers' Compensation

view all

Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

view all

General

view all

Legal News

Judge campaign candidates speak at dinner in Towanda

Judge Beirne unopposed in local race

Attorney General Tom Corbett to visit Bradford County

Beirne will run for full term as judge

Bias in Peer Review

Bradford County Employers Laying Off Workers

Death Benefits Not Mandatory for PA Car Insurance

Bradford County: Judge Beirne presiding

Armenia bans ATVs

Pennsylvania Senate confirms Beirne as Bradford County judge

View All

Legal Library

Personal Injury

More Info

Premises Liability: The Slip and Fall

More Info

Workers' Compensation

More Info

Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

More Info

Newsletters

More Info

General

More Info

Blog Category:

Personal Injury

12/11/2008
James R. Carroll, Jr., Esquire
Comments (0)

Pennsylvania Worker recovers for fall from ladder bought at Home Depot

A man who sustained a traumatic brain injury in a 25-foot fall from a ladder bought at a Home Depot store recovered $406,800. William Sohngen was using the Louisville extension ladder unattended while painting on the side of a two-story home. The base slid and he crashed to the ground because the rubber feet on the ladder's legs were worn down, he claimed.

The jury found that Home Depot was to blame because it sold the ladder and failed to mention that it had been in rental service for four years, which is against company policy. Sohngen also sued Louisville Ladder for defective design, but the jury found it wasn't negligent. Home Depot was found 60 percent liable and Sohngen was found 40 percent liable, which reduced the jury's $678,000 award.

To purchase a full report on this case, go to VerdictSearch.com.

12/4/2008
James R. Carroll, Jr., Esquire
Comments (0)

Third Restatement of Torts Tops High Court's Agenda

When the Pennsylvania Supreme Court convenes this week in Harrisburg, a major products liability case will be on its agenda.  Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc. could pull the state into the mainstream on product liability law or further entrench the Commonwealth in its own rules. PaAJ participated as Amicus on this case. Read more  from the Legal Intelligencer.  Read the Superior Court opinion.

This potentially landmark case could reshape products liability law by adopting the anti-consumer Restatement of Torts (3rd).  Former PaAJ President Cliff Rieders argued in favor of keeping Pennsylvania law consistent with the second restatement.


According to Rieders, the court showed great interest in his argument that the results in cases involving suppliers or distributors would be the same under either the restatement second or the restatement third.  The court did, however, engage in a lengthy “prospective” discussion about the application of the restatement third and its viability in future cases.  Rieders said that the court was extremely thoughtful and receptive to the historical importance of the restatement second, 402A.

10/23/2008
James R. Carroll, Jr., Esquire
Comments (0)

Hedge clipper manufacturer not liable for landscaper's loss of fingers, says jury

A jury in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found that a hedge clipper was not defectively designed, after a landscaper using the equipment accidentally amputated two of his fingers.

Fernando Sanchez, an employee of a landscaping company, was trimming bushes in 2003 when he lost control of an HC-2000 hedge clipper, manufactured by Echo Inc., and was injured when the clipper's blades came in contact with his hand.

Counsel for the plaintiff argued that the clipper should have turned off automatically as soon as Sanchez dropped it. Defense counsel alleged that Sanchez was contributorily negligent, since he was walking backwards directly before the accident.

The jury found no defective design, and ruled that both parties had been negligent, awarding Sanchez zero damages.


To order the full report on Sanchez v. Echo Inc., go to VerdictSearch.com.


Vehicle and Automobile Accidents

    11/4/2008
    James R. Carroll, Jr., Esquire
    Comments (0)

    Investigating Yamaha Rhino


    In a front-page article, the
    Wall Street Journal (11/4, A1, Trottman, Conkey) reports that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is investigating the Yamaha Rhino off-road vehicle "following reports of some 30 deaths," and "Yamaha faces more than 200 lawsuits in state and federal courts, many alleging the Rhino's design is unsafe."

    While "Yamaha has settled some," it "recently beefed up its defense and says it may start to fight rather than settle." According to Yamaha, "plaintiffs' lawyers 'have seized on safety and product enhancements that Yamaha has made to the Rhino to allege baseless claims about the stability of the vehicles.'" The company added that "many injury claims...stem from improper operation, modifications such as removing the protective 'roll cage,' or failure to use a helmet and seat belt." Meanwhile, "some plaintiffs' lawyers allege that Yamaha failed to report Rhino problems to the CPSC as early as it should have."